MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 10:59
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 161
2-Core 327
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 942
98% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Asus(1043 85A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 113
Parallax 103
82% 106 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 103
Splatting 103
82% 99.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 255 261 262 261 259 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,250
Write 561
Mixed 584
SusWrite 291
148% 672 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 67.3
276% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 585
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 206
177% 277 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 166%
Great: 236%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
365GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 80 75 81 79 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 332
Write 104
Mixed 262
SusWrite 124
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 34.7
141% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 193
178% 272 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 102%
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: MVT03H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 163 162 162 169 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 494
Mixed 425
SusWrite 174
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62
212% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 367
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 83.8
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 87.3
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
579GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 133 132 134 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 102
SusWrite 134
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CC2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 33.2
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 34.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 85%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $452
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback