Colorful C.H110M-K PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful C.H110M-K PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful C.H110M-K Pro
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 14:43
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 220
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 420
56% 420 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 10.7
8% 10.8 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shinedisk M667 128G 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 66 59 61 60 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 420
Write 340
Mixed 342
SusWrite 94.6
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 49.5
166% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 257
201% 276 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
353GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 66 65 64 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 93
SusWrite 65.3
67% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 69%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 22 21 21 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 21
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 19
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.7
145% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 22" 1280 720 GSM566A L226W
Typical C.H110M-K PRO Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Colorful C.H110M-K PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $321
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback