Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '21 at 06:57
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 85.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 213 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 670 67% 547 Pts	64-Core 840 52% 840 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% XFX(1682 9290) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.8% Above average	Lighting 66.8 Reflection 73 Parallax 94.8 54% 78.2 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 66.2 Splatting 45.4 47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 359GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 339 310 334 334 322 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 428 Mixed 362 SusWrite 333 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 98.2 4K Mixed 55.2 184% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 356 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 134%
T-force 500GB 500GB 6,415 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 463GB free Firmware: S6OA SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 352 350 344 343 348 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 441 Write 417 Mixed 384 SusWrite 349 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 97.6 4K Mixed 50.2 170% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 120 153% 274 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 126%
WDC WD60EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 119 117 119 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 148 Write 132 Mixed 103 SusWrite 116 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 0.5 8% 3.63 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 10 DQ Mixed 0.8 2% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 29%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 107GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.8% Very poor	Read 39.6 Write 41.2 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 41.8 9% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 13.1 43% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 25 DQ Mixed 24.4 19% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 97%
WDC WD60EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 123 122 123 121 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 154 Write 143 Mixed 108 SusWrite 121 30% 131 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 0.7 14% 5.07 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 9.8 DQ Mixed 1.2 2% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 29%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 143 145 148 147 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 132 Write 118 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 144 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 87%
Generic Flash Disk 66GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 28GB free, PID 7777 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4 4 4 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4 8% 7.12 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x4GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 42.8 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 40.2 120% 42.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 21.1 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	107	6	60	31.3"	1463 914	ACH00FA QHD300QHD300QHD300

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	225x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	86x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $116Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	10x
BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GBCrucialBench 107%, 871 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,104

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16