Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 03:02
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 713
74% 594 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 73
Parallax 86.3
54% 75 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 44
46% 58.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 284 277 264 269 275 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 422
Mixed 387
SusWrite 274
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.6
203% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 355
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
T-force 500GB 500GB
437GB free
Firmware: S6OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 284 275 272 275 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 470
Mixed 424
SusWrite 278
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 56.8
189% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 121
154% 275 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 112%
Great: 126%
WDC WD60EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 140 141 143 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 136
Write 141
Mixed 128
SusWrite 140
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.8
12% 4.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 29%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
148GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.3% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 41.5
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 41.8
9% 41 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 13.1
45% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 27.4
20% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 97%
WDC WD60EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 175 175 178 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 182
Write 184
Mixed 140
SusWrite 174
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
14% 5.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 29%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 140 148 152 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 107
Write 62.8
Mixed 41
SusWrite 142
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 151 149 157 153 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 156
Write 107
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 150
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 45.3
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 23.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 117%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback