Lenovo 82CU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82CU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 19:25
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 71.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 350
103% 199 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 745
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 381A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 31.2
23% 29.5 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 21.2
21% 26 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1892 1782 1518 1909 1554 755 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,185
Write 2,038
Mixed 1,968
SusWrite 1,568
436% 1,939 MB/s
4K Read 76.5
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 99.2
322% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,082
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 1,003
683% 852 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 318%
Great: 404%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D2NP-046 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 58.5
MC Mixed 40.9
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 46.3
SC Mixed 19.4
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 122%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 111 7 60 13.3" 1280 800 LEN8197
Typical 82CU Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82CU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback