Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	39.5% Below average	Memory 41.2 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 113 40% 70.9 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 178 28% 202 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0301 02F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6708 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 2.1 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MMY HC256GS6HA7T 256GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 115 111 59 71 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 336 Write 290 Mixed 278 SusWrite 94.1 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 0.8 45% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 16.4 29% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 12.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23.8"	1280 720	DELA09B DELL P2414H

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	48x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	48x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	48x