Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121207
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 85
2-Core 153
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 377
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
HP(103C 2B4E) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.2
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 6.9
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117K
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 240
Write 216
Mixed 226
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 20.7
90% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 96.9
DQ Mixed 108
79% 103 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 98%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 53 38 37 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 116
Write 101
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 46.5
60% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 77%
USB2.0 CARD-READER 2TB
29GB free, PID 4678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.6
1% 0.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 9905471-069.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 70 0" 1280 720
Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback