Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 496
53% 420 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 21.7
13% 22 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 20
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 256GB-$240
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 428 429 429 445 450 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 424
Write 419
Mixed 300
SusWrite 435
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 27.7
91% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 257
192% 257 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 111%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
8GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 134 138 143 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 107
Write 79.7
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 139
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.5
294% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
4GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 48 52 54 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 28.6
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 52.3
47% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-153.A 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.5% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 6R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 30% 30 225 118 60 26" 1280 720 CVT0003 CVTE TV
Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback