Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 23:18
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 253
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 944
86% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,316
82% 1,316 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3710) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 287
Parallax 192
153% 223 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 211
Splatting 156
165% 208 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 146%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 309 312 312 312 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 480
Mixed 399
SusWrite 324
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 53.9
179% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 366
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
199GB free
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 431 438 444 441 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 437
Mixed 217
SusWrite 428
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 31.4
119% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 126
132% 219 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 297 296 296 295 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 485
Mixed 417
SusWrite 315
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 54.4
180% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 369
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
912GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 200 205 206 206 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 202
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 202
114% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX F4-3200C16-8GVKB KF3200C16D4/8GX F4-3200C16-8GVKB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 6R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 21% 66 278 237 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback