Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 19:32
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$316
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 157
2-Core 310
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,015
97% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,476
91% 1,476 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 67
Parallax 62
40% 59.2 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 57.7
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,690
Write 2,404
Mixed 1899
518% 2,331 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 97.9
324% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,315
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 1,118
842% 1,133 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
196GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 309 308 309 310 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 431
Mixed 384
SusWrite 326
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 57
191% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
464GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1890 1894 1580 1451 1462 1463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,574
Write 1888
Mixed 1,760
SusWrite 1,623
439% 1,961 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 92.6
307% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,387
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 1,212
916% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 353%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C17 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 5.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 23" 1280 720 ACR0318 Acer H236HL
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback