Asus P5K PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K PRO  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 16:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 58
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 76.8
37% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 151
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8491) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.41
3% 4.2 fps
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 3.13
3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
391GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 106
Write 115
Mixed 99.9
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.27
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HH100-08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 52.6
Write 58
Mixed 45.3
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.25
44% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 4.3
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K PRO Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback