Toshiba Satellite L500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L500  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA KSWAA
Memory2.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100506
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 03 '15 at 00:32
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 88.7
30% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 85.9
8-Core 87.5
12% 86.7 Pts
64-Core 88.8
6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 23% Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Toshiba(1179 FF80) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 1.47
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 2.35
2% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 60GB-$45
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 242
Write 97.1
Mixed 135
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 12.6
58% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 25
39% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 76%
Fujitsu MJA2500BH G2 500GB
355GB free
Firmware: 00000018 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 76.2
Write 71.1
Mixed 69
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.25
69% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 47%
ALCOR Flash Disk 4GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.64% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 3.97
Mixed 7.9
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.64
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.007
18% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 5%
Typical Satellite L500 Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback