HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory22.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140325
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 12:49
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 30.6
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 91
31% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 289
26% 221 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 19.2
16% 18.7 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 0.2
11% 15 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 480G 480GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 348 31 37 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 150
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 138
23% 100 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 2.7
22% 8.3 MB/s
DQ Read 99.5
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 41.6
56% 99 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 103%
Hitachi HUS156030VLS600 300GB
215GB free
Firmware: HPH2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 172 173 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 158
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 172
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.6
312% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HUS156060VLS600 600GB
46GB free
Firmware: A760
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 104 110 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 154
Write 145
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 107
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.6
307% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 107%
WDC WD16 00AAJS-75M0A0 160GB
137GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 18 19 19 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 20.9
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 18.3
28% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 14%
WDC WD10 EZEX-21M2NA0 1TB
456GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.5 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.3% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 21.3
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 2.3
22% 17 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5270CH0-CH9 M393B5270CH0-CH9 M393B5270CH0-CH9 M393B5270CH0-CH9 M393B5270CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351R7BFR4C-H9 M393B5270CH0-CH9 M393B5270CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351R... 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.7
2% 0.83 GB/s
Latency 251
16% 251 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback