Sony VPCJ11M1E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSony VPCJ11M1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 16:34
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 143
55% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 178
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Sony(104D 9074) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.72
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 0.3
1% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 210 170 139 124 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 218
Write 211
Mixed 185
SusWrite 162
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 20.3
72% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 180
135% 181 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 123%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
165GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 78 79 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 79.5
Write 76.5
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 78.2
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 MS_0025 Nvidia Default Flat Panel
Typical VPCJ11M1E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCJ11M1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback