Sony VPCJ11M1E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSony VPCJ11M1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 22:07
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 135
54% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 180
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Sony(104D 9074) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.72
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.6
0% 0.95 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 194 149 121 188 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.7% Average
Read 215
Write 207
Mixed 186
SusWrite 174
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 20.7
72% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 180
135% 181 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 123%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
166GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 68 80 77 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 76.3
Write 62.4
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 76.2
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCJ11M1E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCJ11M1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback