PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-S1 (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140612 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 06 '21 at 13:21 |
Run Duration | 343 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$75
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 65 62 58 61 62 MB/s
|
48%
Average
|
|||
44.5%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40% | 45% | 22 | 320 | 255 | 60 | 12.6" | 1920 1080 | AGO0001 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples | 7x |
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 4x |
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 6x |
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples | 4x |
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $199 |