HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1497
Memory	7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '21 at 12:55
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 99.2 52% 82 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 180 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35.2 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 36 29% 36.4 fps	MRender 35.8 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 26.4 26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 263 293 295 291 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 372 Write 346 Mixed 312 SusWrite 276 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 30.8 105% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40.5 DQ Write 91.7 DQ Mixed 53.1 44% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 353GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 119 119 120 121 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 111 Write 106 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 117 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Micron CT102464BD160B.C16 M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 14.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27.9"	1280 720	BNQ7949 BenQ EL2870U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	488x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	204x
Core i7-2600Intel $200Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	141x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	392x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	99x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	45x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	22x

RAM
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	19x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x
9905471-052.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 203 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16