Continental CL-

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemContinental CL-  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 11:41
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 85
1-Core 88
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 324
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.4% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 67.6
56% 70 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 65.4
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 113 117 118 121 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 410
Write 122
Mixed 156
SusWrite 111
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 28.4
100% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 109
93% 138 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 79%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
206GB free
Firmware: JF3OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 73 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 65.4
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 72.3
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-013.A00LF 9905471-001.A01LF 99U5474-013.A00LF 9905471-001.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 4R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 38% 40 316 236 144 27" 1920 1080 MSI3CA9 MSI G27C6
History: Score 47: 8R 2G 1B | Score 41: 4R 5G 6B
Typical CL- Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Continental CL-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback