Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 09:07
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
106% 194 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,266
113% 956 Pts
64-Core 1,289
80% 1,289 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 123
Parallax 161
120% 144 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 140
Splatting 112
116% 146 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SSD-PM2-1TB 1TB
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1297 1400 386 317 259 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 889
Mixed 1,067
SusWrite 650
225% 1,007 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 34.5
156% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 404
316% 440 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 164%
Great: 238%
WD Blue 250GB-$77
150GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 190 179 189 179 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 65.2
Mixed 374
SusWrite 213
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 44.1
149% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 257
211% 301 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 181 180 175 177 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 3.8
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 177
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 168 171 168 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 172
Write 48.2
Mixed 120
SusWrite 167
163% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 36
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 33
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 49
82% 49 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F35 U32J59x
Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $990
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback