Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 23:46
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 161 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 463 46% 375 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3013 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)	48.7% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 59.4 49% 59.6 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 59.6 Splatting 59.7 49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 556 432 375 270 304 277 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 637 Write 606 Mixed 597 SusWrite 369 124% 552 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 42.9 139% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 478 DQ Write 99.7 DQ Mixed 175 158% 251 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 61GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 138 136 137 136 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 403 Write 121 Mixed 147 SusWrite 132 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 19 75% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 62.4 56% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 59GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 73 75 74 75 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 105 Write 96.5 Mixed 76.9 SusWrite 74.2 65% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 700GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 103 111 98 97 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 80.6 Write 97 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 103 62% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB 1,980 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 950GB free, PID 25fc Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 46 47 42 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 39.3 Write 38.2 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 45.6 50% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 62%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 147GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 25.2 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 29.4 36% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 1866 CL10 Series F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 1866 CL10 Series 20GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 18.8 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 13.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	60	49.1"	1280 720	NVS10DE NV Surround

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16