Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 18:13
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 163
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 489
46% 381 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3013 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 100
Parallax 92.3
83% 98.4 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 79.5
73% 90.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 519 504 487 294 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 623
Write 604
Mixed 594
SusWrite 431
127% 563 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 43.5
143% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 98.7
DQ Mixed 173
159% 257 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 109%
Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
147GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 127 126 113 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 338
Write 96.8
Mixed 139
SusWrite 116
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 11.4
52% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 68.3
59% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
63GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 75 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 74.6
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
701GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 163 161 159 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 147
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 161
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98%
Great: 109%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB
147GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 28
Write 28.1
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 29.2
37% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 1866 CL10 Series F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 1866 CL10 Series 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 5R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 13% 122 164 22 144 49.1" 5120 1440 NVS10DE NV Surround
History: Score 36: 5R 2G 5B | Score 42: 6R 3G 3B | Score 49: 8R 1G 6B | Score 44: 5R 4G 7B
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $490
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback