MSI MS-17E2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 8SF
MotherboardMSI MS-17E2  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 21:50
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 229
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 582
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1272) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4223
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.4% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 109
Parallax 114
91% 112 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 108
Splatting 96.8
97% 123 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G 512GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 936 736 743 746 730 739 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 904
Write 1,098
Mixed 867
SusWrite 772
206% 910 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 62.1
206% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1072
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 908
687% 927 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 189%
Great: 212%
HP S700 500GB-$60
465GB free
Firmware: U0329A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 379 394 414 392 400 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 407
Mixed 405
SusWrite 396
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 25.8
123% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 50.4
95% 187 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 26.6
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN175C
Typical MS-17E2 Builds (Compare 1,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback