Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110 6,703 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 29.3 55% 73.1 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 444 42% 351 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M 2,897 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 221D) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2591 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	5.27% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 8 Parallax 6.7 5% 6.97 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 7.8 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.27% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Transcend TS512GMTS430S 512GB 550 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02J0T2DA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 4,491 Write 41.3 Mixed 83.7 320% 1,539 MB/s	4K Read 623 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 5.4 952% 210 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 105%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 853GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,893 Write 21 Mixed 47.6 945% 1,321 MB/s	4K Read 520 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.5 21,867% 174 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 70%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB 1,726 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 622GB free Firmware: JT000A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 144 Write 124 Mixed 56 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.7 232% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 9905428-426.A00LF 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 16.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 17.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23"	1280 720	DEL409A DELL P2314H

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16