Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5750M APU 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Memory 30.6 1-Core 33.1 2-Core 69.5 26% 44.4 Pts	4-Core 99.7 8-Core 96.2 13% 97.9 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G 4,043 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 510A) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	2.75% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 3.2 3% 3.63 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.75% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 204 204 219 223 225 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 302 Write 243 Mixed 240 SusWrite 223 57% 252 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 16.9 54% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 128 95% 127 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 5.3 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 251 16% 251 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-5350M APUAMDBench 38%, 1,074 samples	1x
A10-5750M APUAMDBench 41%, 4,247 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples	1x
Radeon HD 8450GAMDBench 2%, 901 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x
1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 4,437 samples	1x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16