Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130912
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '21 at 15:40
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5200 APU 10,450 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 54.5 1-Core 30.9 2-Core 62.4 32% 49.3 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 120 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA85) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2.7 2% 2.5 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 63 68 43 40 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 406 Write 335 Mixed 279 SusWrite 79.6 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 12.9 45% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 3.5 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 34.2 32% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 60%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 6GB free, PID 0745 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 14 20 20 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 30.5 Write 20.1 Mixed 21 SusWrite 18.7 29% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 4.2 291% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 249 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 7.2 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	30	72.3"	1135 617	GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C70D-A Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A

CPU
E1-2100 APUAMDBench 17%, 4,569 samples	15x
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	13x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	5x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	15x
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	13x
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	10x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	2x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 45%, 249 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16