Aures YUNO-II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAures YUNO-II  (all builds)
MotherboardAURES YUNO-II
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 08:49
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 285
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 564
69% 529 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 23.3
15% 21 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 128GB 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2107XKR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 221 257 397 97 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1584
Write 503
Mixed 604
SusWrite 265
162% 739 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 29.2
223% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 409
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 335
287% 417 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 164%
Great: 152%
Kingston DT 101 II 2GB
2GB free, PID 1625
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Read 22
Write 6.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.4
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-H2666GSC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 11.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 1 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC0CF PHL 223V5
Typical YUNO-II Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Aures YUNO-II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback