Asus UX32A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus UX32A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX32A
Memory8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 07:37
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2367M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 66.6
34% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 93.1
8-Core 80.1
12% 86.6 Pts
64-Core 88.5
6% 88.5 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2135) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2761
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.13 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 61 65 68 66 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 65.2
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 62.6
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF Elpida 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX32A Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX32A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback