| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201207 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 04 '21 at 02:51 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.7%
Very good
|
81% 147 Pts
|
69% 554 Pts
|
42% 671 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
18% 24.9 fps
|
16% 19.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 437 231 3.2 2.8 3.2 MB/s
|
83.6%
Excellent
|
74% 328 MB/s
|
141% 52.2 MB/s
|
159% 242 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
352GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 80 79 79 79 MB/s
|
45.4%
Average
|
53% 71.8 MB/s
|
110% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
|
109%
Outstanding
|
113% 39.4 GB/s
|
100% 35.1 GB/s
|
47% 84.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 75: 10R 8G 1B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% | 63% | 30 | 339 | 273 | 60 | 18.5" | 1366 768 | ACR021C S191HQL |
Typical A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 357 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 35x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 35x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples | 28x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 22x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $183 |