Gigabyte GA-H87M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 16:08
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 158
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 333
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Gigabyte(1458 379D) 3GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 38.4
30% 38 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 25.6
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 30%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$44
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 357 351 360 363 355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 469
Write 370
Mixed 311
SusWrite 348
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 35.4
123% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 247
189% 256 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
424GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 409 425 426 432 435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 441
Mixed 367
SusWrite 408
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 48.6
145% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 328
236% 304 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 88 67 49 92 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 97.3
Write 26.2
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 73
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 68%
MB4000GEQNH 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 44 43 44 44 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 169
Write 42.9
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 42.8
55% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.3
116% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 19
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 GSM59D8 22EN43
Typical GA-H87M-HD3 Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-HD3 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback