Asus B43J

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus B43J  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON B43J
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 05:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 70.3
37% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 141
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 17.8
1% 17.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1C12) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.9
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM034-2GH17A 500GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 23 35 30 27 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 8.7
Write 25
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 28.3
21% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Kingston KF073F-ELD 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.1
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B43J Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus B43J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback