MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 67
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 596
75% 571 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 112
Parallax 125
98% 119 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 111
Splatting 104
105% 133 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
86GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1105 309 221 210 197 236 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,116
Write 1166
Mixed 1,122
SusWrite 380
212% 946 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 75.9
253% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 1,157
DQ Mixed 1,144
876% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 200%
Great: 295%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2086 1672 187 226 97 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 2,144
Mixed 1,718
SusWrite 723
348% 1,543 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 84.7
287% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,123
839% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 246%
Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
471GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 206 211 214 216 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 118
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 211
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST2000VX003-1HH164 2TB
246GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 119 117 112 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 149
Write 144
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 114
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 101%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
26GB free, PID 0cd1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 28 21 27 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 57.7
Write 19
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 22.2
32% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0
98% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW8GX4M1E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW8GX4M1E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 26.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 4R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 45% 33 223 19 60 23.8" 1920 1080 AUS24CC VZ249
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $684
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback