bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61WW
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110118
Uptime10 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 13:52
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 161
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 328
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 22 26 57 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 54.9
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
30GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 4.5 6.6 11 7.5 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 10.8
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 8.9
18% 16 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.1
136% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 38%
WD 2500BMV External 250GB
181GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 18 18 21 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 23.3
Mixed 22
SusWrite 19.5
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-002.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 1R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 9% 45 12 8 60 23" 1920 1080 HWP3031 HP 23xi
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 12: 1R 2G 1B
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback