Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '17 at 08:20
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 661
70% 562 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 74.5
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 65
61% 71 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 67
Splatting 57.6
53% 66.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
121GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 492
Mixed 500
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 55.3
199% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 139
157% 267 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 126%
Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
772GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 102
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.31
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 159
Mixed 131
112% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.35
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS725025A9A364 250GB-$82
224GB free
Firmware: PC2OC70E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 95.6
Write 53.6
Mixed 63.8
53% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.43
95% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
147GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 112
Write 117
Mixed 104
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.32
109% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback