MSI MS-1552

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Modern 15 A11MU
MotherboardMSI MS-1552  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 18:50
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1195G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 71.4
1-Core 188
2-Core 352
106% 204 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 812
87% 691 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
MSI(1462 12E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8439
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 32.6
24% 31.2 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 20.9
22% 27.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 1050 1046 857 1082 436 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,683
Write 1,087
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 905
262% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 91.2
324% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 614
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 264
339% 595 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 257%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 24
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 18.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical MS-1552 Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1552

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback