Asus F1A75-V EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60
FM1 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 73.7
42% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 105
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3800
Asus(1043 0234) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 2.1
6% 6.9 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 3
Splatting 8.3
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$28
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 113 110 112 114 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 106
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate BUP RD 4TB
2.5TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 30 30 30 30 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 23
Write 24.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 27.4
34% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-037.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V EVO Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback