MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A33
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 16:07
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 728
73% 591 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.2% Good
Lighting 81.4
Reflection 124
Parallax 76.3
66% 94 fps
MRender 77.6
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 68.2
60% 74 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 593 276 271 272 271 270 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 1,415
Mixed 585
SusWrite 325
235% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 46.6
183% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 596
479% 681 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 185%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
137GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 169 168 169 169 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 173
Mixed 87
SusWrite 168
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
137GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 74 72 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 49.9
Mixed 42
SusWrite 70.4
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$24
118GB free
Firmware: JC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 94.5
Write 100
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 71.1
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
118GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 68 75 95 69 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 85.8
Write 33
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 73.9
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 31.3
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 75 27" 1280 720 DELD0A1 SE2717H/HX
Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback