Gigabyte GA-Aero 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Aero 14  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 08:16
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 81
2-Core 147
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 393
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 6.2
6% 15.5 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MTS800 M.2 256GB-$140
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 128 91 72 70 55 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.2% Very poor
Read 191
Write 118
Mixed 118
SusWrite 88.3
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 0.8
17% 7.7 MB/s
DQ Read 3.6
DQ Write 65.8
DQ Mixed 5.9
13% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 97%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
247GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 361 379 355 356 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 399
Write 333
Mixed 340
SusWrite 350
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 30.7
87% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 48.2
40% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 0420 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 1R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 20% 20 7 5 60 13.9" 1280 701 AUO113D
Typical GA-Aero 14 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Aero 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback