MSI MS-17F5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 10UEK
MotherboardMSI MS-17F5  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210601
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 00:49
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 63
1-Core 142
2-Core 275
84% 160 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 746
79% 632 Pts
64-Core 993
61% 993 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0555 27A8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.1% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 3.6
4% 25.4 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 2.5
5% 6.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 1043 823 1020 945 989 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,620
Write 65.7
Mixed 125
SusWrite 832
143% 661 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 34.9
133% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 93.6
130% 257 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 171%
Great: 247%
Seagate Portable 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Mixed 14.5
12% 14.5 MB/s
4K Write 0.2
11% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G49CD0-AYC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 16.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 144 165.4" 1280 720 AUO978F
Typical MS-17F5 Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback