Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 21:33
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,037
98% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,429
88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 60.7
Parallax 85.6
53% 70.3 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 44.4
47% 58.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 351 315 317 314 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 438
Mixed 377
SusWrite 334
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 53.3
177% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 193
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 109 109 111 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 83.4
Write 63.2
Mixed 51
SusWrite 108
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 96%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
192GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 91.8
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 95.5
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
829GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 66 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 66.2
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 67
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 40.8
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 39.7
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 101%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 DEL4187 DELL P2719HC
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback