Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 06:47
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 74.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,076
100% 831 Pts
64-Core 1,418
88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 84.3
55% 72.4 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 54.4
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 419 443 449 446 420 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 450
Mixed 378
SusWrite 436
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 57.9
188% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 77 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 93
Write 69.2
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 76.9
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.3
114% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 96%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
208GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 121 122 122 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 84.6
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 123
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
915GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 108 105 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 101
Mixed 63
SusWrite 107
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 83%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.35% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 10.6
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 10.3
17% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 30.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 32
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback