ECS A780LM-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS A780LM-M2  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 16:57
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 85.3
42% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 162
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3.3
4% 3.07 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 64 50 62 53 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 62
Mixed 41
SusWrite 55.6
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
273GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 108 109 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 104
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 108
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
465GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 66 52 62 55 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 118
Write 107
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 57.4
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 69%
IT-CEO USB2.0SATADevice 500GB
291GB free, PID 4511
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 19.5
Mixed 23.5
28% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VS2GB1333D4 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A780LM-M2 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A780LM-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback