Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M730  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 09:19
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 137
56% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 393
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
PNY(196E 133C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 111
Parallax 125
100% 119 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 113
Splatting 103
103% 129 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 86 236 236 232 235 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.4% Above average
Read 233
Write 172
Mixed 221
SusWrite 171
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 28.3
95% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 162
121% 162 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PDZ- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 38.2
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 6R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 24% 41 110 6 60 24" 1920 1080 FUS082C B24T-7 LED PG
Typical CELSIUS M730 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback