HP t610 WW Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.83% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP t610 WW Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17E2
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 04:26
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD G-T56N
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.5% Terrible
Memory 17.6
1-Core 7.6
2-Core 5.9
8% 10.4 Pts
4-Core 8.7
8-Core 13.3
1% 11 Pts
64-Core 13.7
1% 13.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.5%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 17E2) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.940.11.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 129 90 168 132 136 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.83% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 5.8
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 119
11% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.7
5% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 9.83%
Great: 108%
16gb SATA Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free
Firmware: SFDDA01A
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 39.9
Mixed 14.4
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 27%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.3 7.3 7.4 7.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.8
8% 7.27 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.88% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2.4
6% 2.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.4 GB/s
Latency 339
12% 339 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t610 WW Thin Client Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP t610 WW Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback