Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2PV
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime9 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 04:22
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 198
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 286
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.22025.1006
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 33.2
19% 28.4 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 25.9
22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LMH-128V2M-11 MSATA 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FM7110A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 105 108 101 101 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 431
Write 141
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 107
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 30.8
117% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 97.3
DQ Mixed 109
93% 139 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 82%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
736GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 87 85 76 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 73.8
Write 66.6
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 80.3
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$31
448GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 71 105 106 103 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 96.3
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 96
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 76%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.6 2.5 3.2 2.9 2.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 2.8
6% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 20.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 7R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 22% 46 135 33 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7840 BenQ G2420HD
Typical GA-H110M-S2PV-CF Builds (Compare 682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback