User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '17 at 21:45
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6360U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 151
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 183
21% 163 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris 540 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
8.97% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 9.81
8% 10.1 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 15.5
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE128HMGR-00005 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4400Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 464
Write 132
Mixed 203
58% 266 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 12.6
101% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 33.4
71% 150 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 74%
Toshiba MK3263GSXN 320GB
59GB free
Firmware: GC002M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 51.5
Mixed 49.9
40% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.23
59% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA MK2565GSX 250GB
82GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 51.4
Write 51.7
Mixed 47.1
64% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.27
61% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G002771-2G1A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 10.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback