MSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C92
MotherboardMSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 73.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,085
99% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,460
90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3605) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 190
Parallax 193
139% 185 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 180
Splatting 128
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1249 386 391 391 401 392 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,604
Write 2,269
Mixed 1,621
SusWrite 535
391% 1,757 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 92.2
315% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 1,078
DQ Mixed 1,145
832% 1,075 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 281%
Great: 302%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
466GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1369 1004 1011 1014 1011 1005 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,026
Write 2,207
Mixed 1,778
SusWrite 1069
398% 1,770 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 76.7
267% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1343
DQ Write 1,179
DQ Mixed 1265
947% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 285%
Great: 297%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC95
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 79 77 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 80.3
Write 22.4
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 77.6
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 108
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 28.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 27.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 7R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 19% 104 323 253 144 24" 1920 1080 DELD0E3 S2419HGF
Typical MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92) Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $743
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback