MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '17 at 18:44
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 272
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 1,007
93% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,415
88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2952 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 197
Parallax 186
128% 180 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 184
Splatting 128
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,522
Write 1,238
Mixed 1,463
383% 1,741 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 43.4
186% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 165
209% 376 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 254%
Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
57GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 511
Write 150
Mixed 197
62% 286 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 17.1
88% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 44.9
59% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
35GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 484
Write 262
Mixed 267
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 10.5
65% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 94.9
DQ Mixed 23.6
48% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
541GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 178
Mixed 157
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.34
88% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 45.4
MC Mixed 41.6
131% 46 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 25.9
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback