Asus P8Z77-V LX2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX2  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 06:42
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 84
2-Core 189
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 356
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 71.3
58% 73.3 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 70.6
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 75 117 60 35 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 455
Write 388
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 104
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 15.3
60% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 17.7
DQ Mixed 1.7
28% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 100%
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 209 208 206 205 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.3% Above average
Read 240
Write 221
Mixed 194
SusWrite 202
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 24.7
91% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 96.6
DQ Mixed 134
102% 139 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 80%
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 218 217 214 214 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.8% Good
Read 250
Write 217
Mixed 199
SusWrite 206
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 30
116% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 137
119% 177 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
640GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 124 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 118
Write 100
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 123
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 23" 1280 720 DEL4077 DELL P2312H
Typical P8Z77-V LX2 Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback