Lenovo 90H90001US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90H90001US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E1
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171006
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 23:36
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 191
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 514
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 21.1
19% 21.5 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 18.3
18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 100 42 93 92 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 86.8
70% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
494GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 31 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 28.9
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 31.1
24% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
15GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 5 3.9 4 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 35
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4
12% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.6
172% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 9R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 21% 75 237 171 60 23.8" 1920 1080 ELE0000 ELMT2417C
History: Score 34: 3R 4G 7B | Score 58: 9R 3G 4B
Typical 90H90001US Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 90H90001US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback