Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 18:26
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 204
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 396
54% 399 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.1% Very good
Lighting 97.2
Reflection 108
Parallax 147
79% 117 fps
MRender 89.7
Gravity 106
Splatting 76.3
73% 90.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 69 50 45 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 361
Write 342
Mixed 234
SusWrite 93.8
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 34.4
113% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 50.3
45% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 114%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
3GB free
Firmware: 1AA01110
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 46.3
Write 58.7
Mixed 40.3
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
41GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 139 101 117 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 136
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMP12GX3M3A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMP12GX3M3A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.4% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 20.6
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F54 C32JG5x
Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback